That's right, it's a Buchs-Bonus Thursday - not one but two posts! How you like me now? Anyways: #7: Chuck Norris does not hunt because the word hunting implies the probability of failure. Chuck Norris goes killing. I know it's more or less old news by now, but I had to mention it. If you haven't already... please, go read now. And, if you're interested, you can read His response (also, turn on your speakers and check out the home page).
In an article for ESPN "Insider" today, John Hollinger writes about how the "Bucks aren't as good as standings indicate", and that they're more lucky than good (13-1 in games decided by 5 or less). Since the full article is only available to subscribers ($$), I won't get to read his full rationale for that argument. From what I can tell, he's basing it on a recent game between the Pacers and Bucks (the Good Guys lost 112-88). Now, if somebody wants to argue that the Pacers are better than the Bucks, that's fine (although: IND -J.O. ). But statements like this are just plain stupid: «And Milwaukee, despite seemingly heading toward a playoff season, is actually no better ...